Gaspee![]() |
Nathan
Salisbury (1751-1817)
The Gaspee Days Committee at www.gaspee.COM is a civic-minded nonprofit organization that operates many community events in and around Pawtuxet Village, including the famous Gaspee Days Parade each June. These events are all designed to commemorate the 1772 burning of the hated British revenue schooner, HMS Gaspee, by Rhode Island patriots as America's 'First Blow for Freedom' TM. Our historical research center, the Gaspee Virtual Archives at www.gaspee.ORG , has presented these research notes as an attempt to gather further information on one who has been suspected of being associated with the the burning of the Gaspee. Please e-mail your comments or further questions to webmaster@gaspee.org. |
Evidence to Indict Nathan
Salisbury: While in the process of doing a deep Internet search on the term "Gaspee" in late 2000, it was discovered that: We found a references to five Nathan Salsiburys that appear in the 1790 RI census lists <www.rootsweb.com>, but they give no detailed information. A subsequent e-mail to the Homer, NY Chamber of Commerce put me in contact with the Cortland County (in Upstate, NY) historian, who responded:: "There is a reference in the 1885 Smith's History of Cortland County which does state that Nathan Salisbury lived in R.I. until 1803. (original spelling and grammar):Nathan Salisbury, sen., was Lieutenant under Capt. Burgess of the company which, from Warwick Neck, fired into, captured, and burned the British schooner, Gaspe in 1772. He resided in Cranston until 1795, when he moved to Providence, R.I. In March, 1803, he moved his family to Hartford, Washington county, New York, where he purchased a farm and remained until 1806, when he again moved his family to Cazenovia, Madison county, New York. At this place he only remained through the winter, and in March, 1807, came with his family to Homer, then in Onondaga county (450).Hope this helps! We do have significant problems with Smith's account that Nathan Salisbury was a "Lieutenant under Capt. Burgess of the company which, from Warwick Neck, fired into, captured, and burned the British schooner, Gaspe in 1772." This doesn't add up as factual for several reasons. The biographical sketch was written by the Cortland County historian in 1885 and it is doubtful he had access to other sources. He was probably quoting Nate Salisbury's grandchildren and the family history was .... shall we say .... embellished a bit. No other reliable first person account of the Gaspee incident (and there are many, both British and American) tell of any artillery firings. His claim to have been part of a 'Burgess's Company' that from Warwick Neck fired onto the Gaspee is also totally unknown in published references, although a British map of the Revolutionary period does depict an artillery battery at that location (see map [1.5 Mb]). Additionally, Warwick Neck is about 5 miles South of Gaspee (Namquid) Point where the ship was aground; a distance much too far for the cannons of 1772 vintage. That all being said, in 2005, Nathan Salisbury's descendant, and fellow Gaspee researcher, Earl Salisbury, discovered a letter written to his relative who happened to be with the American Antiquarian Society, relating in detail the attack on the Gaspee, and which includes a section on artillery firing on the Gaspee as she lay aground. As Leonard Bucklin, a noted trial lawyer, relates: I really think what we have is why lawyers do not rely on hearsay. I suspect he was in a battery of artillery and that he was in the boatload of persons that may have rowed over ..... and were at the attack on the Gaspee. Persons hearing him talk could have heard him say, on separate occassions: We can only surmise that perhaps Nathan Salisbury served with Capt. Burgess' Company, at some time during the pre-Revolutionary or Revolutionary times, but that he happened to be near the Providence docks the night of June 9/10, 1772, and was invited along for the 'ride', so to speak. Click here to Visit the Controversies of the Cannon caused by Salisbury descendants Unfortunately, as of now, Nathan Salisbury's claim to have been part of the group that burned the Gaspee in 1772 is unsubstantiated by any other source than his own epitaph. Given the unlikelihood of unearthing further sources on the matter we must accept his participation in the attack on the Gaspee as true. As Bucklin states: Before the American Revolution, the identity of the persons involved was kept secret. But after the Revolution, persons involved in the Gaspee Affair were celebrated. It is my feeling that is was unlikely that someone would lie to make a claim that he was a militia officer and that he was in the boats that did the attacking. The population of the Providence area was small enough that a lie of this nature would likely be exposed. It is also of interest that we find in the annals of the Gaspee Affair, the mention of Nathan Salisbury's eldest brother, Peleg Salisbury, who was empanelled on the jury which found William Dudingston, Captain of the Gaspee, culpable for the damages coming forth from his seizure of a cargo of rum taken from the Greene family in February of 1772 (see Bryant, SW, Rhode Island Justice-1772 Vintage, Rhode Island History, July 1967 26:3, p66.) Descendant Earl Salisbury informs us that Peleg was later a judge in Warwick. It is a testimony to the power of the Internet search that we have found the record of Nathan Salisbury at all, far removed as it is from Rhode Island. Salisbury's ancestors have known of his heritage for many years. In fact, Earl Salisbury has been portraying Nathan Salisbury, and retelling the story of the Burning of the Gaspee throughout the Midwest for years. Without the assistance of the world wide web, we might never have known. |
Biographical Notes:
Nathan Salisbury served as a private
in
Capt. Peter
Burlingame's
Co., Colonel John Matthewson's Reg. R.I. Miltia. NSDAR 136111, Mrs.
Roberta
Horn Little. Later served as Corp. in Capt. Benjamin West's Co. Colonel
John Lanham's Reg. NSDAR 17823, Mrs Avoma Olive Sawm Dow,
Unfortunately, Nathan Salisbury did not live long enough to have
applied for a pension based on his Revolutionary War service. He
died in 1817, and the earliest non-disability pension application we
have found was filed in 1818. Therefore, this can be used to
infer that he had not
been disabled due to any war related service. No record of a Salisbury is found in the 1770 List of Providence Taxpayers. Nathan Salisbury removed from Warwick to Cranston, RI and resided there until 1795 when he removed to Providence. Leonard Bucklin of the Bucklin Society claims he was actually from Bristol at the time of the attack on the Gaspee. Per the Providence Phoenix; 22 June1802; At a town meeting of Providence, Nathan Salisbury along with 9 others were appointed Field Drivers. A field driver was the person responsible for gathering up unattended and wandering livestock from the town common or other premises. In Mar 1803 he removed to Harford, Cortland County, NY where he remained until 1806. He then went to Cazenovia, Madison, NY. In Mar 1807 he went to Homer, Onondaga County, NY and located at Cold Brook. |
Genealogical
Notes: Nathan Salisbury
b 1
DEC 1751 in Charlestown, MA or
Warwick,
RI d: 4 MAY 1817 in Scott, Cortland, NY
Father: Martin P. Salisbury b: 4 JUL 1708 in Milton, Norfolk County, MA or Rehoboth, MA Mother: Mary Pierce b: 18 OCT 1718 in Charlestown, Suffolk County, MA or Rehoboth, MA Marriage 1 Abigail Stone b: 19 OCT 1753 in Cranston, RI on 16 May 1771 Children (all born in Cranston, RI)
Waite Salisbury b: 19 DEC 1771 m Samuel BUDLONG, Jr. 1791 Further genealogical information can be obtained by contacting descendant Earl Salisbury. |
The Gaspee Days Committee therefore gladly recognizes Nathan Salisbury as a true American patriot, and confer on him the status as an acknowledged 'Gaspee Raider'. |
![]() |
Back to Top | Back to Gaspee.com | Back to Gaspee Virtual Archives |